It's been an old saw forever, "As Maine goes, so goes the nation;" a point of pride when Margaret Chase Smith made her Declaration of Conscience against Joseph McCarthy back in the 50's, so we are particularly saddened given the outcome of Maine's recent gay marriage referendum that overturned a law which would have allowed single-sex couples to enjoy the benefits of marriage as defined by the statutes.
Defeated by a slim margin, (53% to 47%) the measure to "preserve traditional marriage" found its strongest support among rural, inland and Catholic communities where the "family values" vote is strongest. Urban and university communities, often populated by recent Mainers and individuals who enjoy a variety of lifestyles, not to mention the NPR- listening, Obama-voting, Sushi--eating progressives voted overwhelmingly to sustain the legislature's action, but sadly, despite the strength of their support, it was not enoughAnd this in a year when other seemingly liberal or progressive measures like decriminalization of medical marijuana or a third overturn of a stringent "tax payers bill of rights" went through with no trouble.
What is it about this issue, gay marriage, that gets our knickers in such a twist? Is it a refusal to tamper with one of "nature's laws?" That marriage ought to be available only to a man and a woman? An inability to acknowledge that which we all know has been present in human societies for as long as there have been human societies?To my way of thinking, any two individuals who want, before the state, (and maybe God, too,) to pledge their willingness to honor, defend, protect and love another human being in sickness and in health, (and all the rest) ought to be encouraged to do so. Family units, especially when children are involved (and in many gay relationships, this is the case) are the bedrock of our society no matter the sexual preferences of the partners. Anything we can do to encourage and support such pledges of fidelity and stability ought to be celebrated.
And I know, I know, there are those of my more religious friends who believe such things as gayness-- never mind gay marriage-- to be an abomination. They claim to hate the sin, but love the sinner, and fear the crumbling of civil society as we know it (reference Sodom and Gomorrah) if we allow such biblically-prohibited behavior to advance with the legal protection of the state. (Explain to me, if you will, how true bible believers can go about wearing mixed fibers or eating cheeseburgers and why, if gayness is such a problem, it is not addressed directly in the ten commandments? But I digress...)
But I'm no biblical scholar, and others have a right to their beliefs. I suppose they even have a right to insist their way be practiced by all, especially if their fundamental code of right and wrong strongly prohibits a certain, to them, reprehensible and immoral behavior that seriously endangers societal stability. Face it, while I can't fathom how allowing gays to marry like us regular-army heteros could be so wrong, I draw my own bright lines at polygamy, genital mutilation of women, genocide, and suttee (the ancient Hindu practice of throwing oneself on the burning funeral pyre of dead husband)
and representative of the mores of the times. Politics (and religion) evolve to endorse the values a society needs to survive and prosper. Not so long ago, we (and by that I mean you white guys) used politics and religion to separate the races, prohibit women from voting and sanction the ownership of slaves. For a zillion reasons, mostly economic, we left these "old views" behind in favor of a newer, more "enlightened" set of values. In the crystal-clear vision of the rear-view mirror, it seems unfathomable that we could have believed, behaved and acted as we did. And yet, we did. What's even more hopeful, to me, however, is our ability to change. Call it education, awareness, necessity or simply evolution, as time passes, we become more tolerant. More broadminded. Less fearful. More, well, human.
That it could be sooner. That it could be less hurtful. That it could happen by itself. It turns out, however, that social change takes not only time, but also courage. And a willingness to stand up, in the face of insurmountable obstacles for what is right. Like Mandela, Milk and... Margaret.









Recent Comments